Modeling Time-to-Acceptance for ISI-Indexed Journals in the Profession of Library and Information Science

Supplementary Files

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3


Information Models
Statistical Models
Information Science
Journal Productivity

How to Cite

Wu, J., & Yang, L. (2017). Modeling Time-to-Acceptance for ISI-Indexed Journals in the Profession of Library and Information Science. International Journal of Librarianship, 2(2), 62–83.
Received 2017-04-19
Accepted 2017-05-26
Published 2017-12-15
Bookmark and Share


There are many factors affecting review duration after a paper has been submitted to a journal. Developing a time-to-acceptance model of each journal for the whole time span from submission to acceptance can help researchers when they are selecting journals to publish research results, as well as help editors when they are optimizing workflow and strategy. Using ISI-indexed journals in the profession of library and information science as an example, this study aims to explore the possible patterns of time-to-acceptance for refereed articles. Based on the theories of maximum likelihood estimation, this article models probability distributions for the retrieved data through the R package fitdistrplus. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is further used to determine if the distribution for each journal can be accepted.


Adler, R. W., & Liyanarachchi, G. (2015). Successful authors’ views on the editorial review processes of accounting journals. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(4), 411-437.

Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21(1), 243-247.

Albert, J. (2009). Bayesian computation with R. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bialy, S., Blessing, J. A., Stehman, F. B., Reardon, A. M., & Blaser, K. M. (2013). Gynecologic oncology group strategies to improve timeliness of publication. Clinical Trials, 10(4), 617-623.

Chen, H., Chen, C. H., & Jhanji, V. (2013). Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology, 120(8), 1697-1701.

De Marchi, M., & Rocchi, M. (2001). The editorial policies of scientific journals: Testing an impact factor model. Scientometrics, 51(2), 395-404.

Delignett-Muller, M. L., & Dutang, C. (2014). Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distribution. J. Stat. Softw, 64, 1-34.

Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G., & Braun, T. (2001). Publication speed in analytical chemistry journals. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41(6), 1452-1456.

Elsner, J. B., & Jagger, T. H. (2013). Hurricane climatology: A modern Statistical Guide Using R. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.

Emerald Group Publishing. (2014). Author Guidelines. Retrieved March 8, 2016 from

Greifeneder, E. (2013). 30 days to first decision: time span in Library Hi Tech from submission to first decision. Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 5-7.

Hodges, R. E., Elsner, J. B., & Jagger, T. H. (2012). Predictive models for time to acceptance: An example using “hurricane” articles in AMS journals. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(6), 879-882.

James, R. (2014). Tenure hacks: The 12 secrets of making tenure. Fresno, CA: CreateSpace.

Johnson, C. (2005). Improving the timeliness of manuscript handling. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 28(5), 291-292.

Lee, E T., & Wang, J. (2013). Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Lievers, W. B. (2013). Manuscript processing times are negatively correlated with journal impact factors / La corrélation négative entre les délais de traitement des manuscrits et les facteurs d'impact des revues scientifiques. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(4), 225-236.

Metcalfe, N. B. (2002). Journal impact factors. Nature, 376(720). Retrieved November 29, 2015, from

NIST/SEMATECH. (2013). NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods. Retrieved March 26, 2016, from

Palese, A., Coletti, S., & Dante, A. (2013). Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(4), 543-551.

Pautasso, M., & Schäfer, H. (2009). Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals. Scientometrics, 84(2), 307-315.

Ray, J., Berkwits, M., & Davidoff, F. (2000). The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal. The American Journal of Medicine, 109(2), 131-135.

Rodger, S., McKenna, K., & Brown, T. (2007). Quality and impact of occupational therapy journals: Authors’ perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(3), 174-184.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.

Taborsky, M. (2007). Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn?. Ethology, 113(1), 1-8.

Vose, D. (2010). Fitting distributions to data. Retrieved March 8, 2016 from

Yu, G., Guo, R., & Li, Y. J. (2006). The influence of publication delays on three ISI indicators. Scientometrics, 69(3), 511-527.

Yu, G., Wang, X. H., & Yu, D. R. (2005). The influence of publication delays on impact factors. Scientometrics, 64(2), 235-246.


Download data is not yet available.