Name Authority Control in Digital Humanities: Building a Name Authority Database of Shanghai Library

Supplementary Files



Name Authority Control
Digital humanities
Linked Data

How to Cite

Xia, C., & Liu, W. (2018). Name Authority Control in Digital Humanities: Building a Name Authority Database of Shanghai Library. International Journal of Librarianship, 3(1), 21–35.
Received 2018-05-13
Accepted 2018-06-26
Published 2018-07-17
Bookmark and Share


Libraries as a type of social institution have a long history of collecting, preserving and spreading the knowledge of mankind and have cumulated a vast amount of highly structured data conforming to library and information standards. Among these data, especially, name authority data are fundamentally important for digital humanities. However, traditional library data are not built in the way that digital humanities research requires, which makes it difficult for digital humanities researchers to use them directly. This study is to address this problem through using the Linked Data approach to build knowledge bases in transforming and normalizing name authority data into the format that can be easily deployed by digital humanities research. A name authority database was built on various sources and formed the content infrastructure to provide Linked Open Data services, which enables sophisticated searches and uses of document resources knowledge base with multiple types of documents and multimedia, instead of digital collections with only a keyword search function. The process of design and development as well as the way through which resources are interlinked are described in detail in this paper.


American Council of Learned Societies. (2006). Our cultural Commonwealth: The report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from

Hannemann, J., & Kett, J. (2010). World Library and Information Congress: 79th IFLA General Conference and Assembly. In Proceedings of the world library and information congress (pp. 1–11). Gothenburge, Sweden.

Harvard University, Academia Sinica, & Peking University. (2018). Chinese Biographical Database. Retrieved April 19, 2018, from

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Library of Congress. (2016). Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model [webpage]. Retrieved April 11, 2018, from

Neubert, J., & Tochtermann, K. (2012). Linked Library Data: Offering a Backbone for the Semantic Web. In D. Lukose, A. R. Ahmad, & A. Suliman (Eds.), Knowledge Technology (Vol. 295, pp. 37–45). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

OCLC. (2012). VIAF (The Virtual International Authority File). Retrieved April 11, 2018, from

Papadakis, I., Kyprianos, K., & Stefanidakis, M. (2015). Linked Data URIs and Libraries: The Story So Far. D-Lib Magazine, 21(5/6).

Riva, P., Bœuf, P. L., & Žumer, M. (2017). IFLA Library Reference Model A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. International Federation of Library Assoications and Institutions, 101.

Schich, M., Song, C., Ahn, Y.-Y., Mirsky, A., Martino, M., Barabasi, A.-L., & Helbing, D. (2014). A network framework of cultural history. Science, 345(6196), 558–562.

Smith-Yoshimura, K., & Michelson, D. (2013, March 27). Irreconcilable differences? Name authority control & humanities scholarship – Hanging Together. Retrieved April 19, 2018, from

Xia C. (2017). Building a Digital Humanities Platform by Using Linked Open Data Services. Journal of Library and Information Science, 43(1), 47–70.


Download data is not yet available.