Designing and Prioritizing Key Performance Indicators in Evaluating and Improving the Productivity of Special Libraries (the organization under study: Water and electricity industry of Iran)
PDF

How to Cite

Fattahi, M., noori, D., & azimi, A. (2025). Designing and Prioritizing Key Performance Indicators in Evaluating and Improving the Productivity of Special Libraries (the organization under study: Water and electricity industry of Iran). International Journal of Librarianship, 10(4), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2025.vol10.4.515

Abstract

This research study aims to determine and prioritize essential performance criteria and indicators for evaluating and enhancing the productivity of special library services within the public sector’s water and electricity industry of Iran. Focusing on the perspective of the Objectives and Key Results (OKR) system, we first addressed the pathology of library service quality. This was done by measuring the integrated LibQUAL service quality model and the Three-pronged model. BSC and PPM were applied to analyze management structures and library performance, forming the basis for identifying critical success factors and designing key performance indicators (KPIs). The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method played a key role in our evaluation, as it helped us to weight and rank a list of critical success factors (CSFs) according to success criteria (SC). In the following step, KPIs were designed and selected using the Six-step method proposed by Zis et al. (2023), based on these factors. The research findings revealed eleven critical success factors that influence the productivity management of libraries. The most significant criterion identified was the learning culture (95.0%), followed by customer satisfaction (72.0%), a positive experience (64.0%), and access to information resources (61.0%). Finally, seven key performance indicators for libraries were introduced as follows: satisfaction, net promoters, acquisition cost, repeat purchase/loan rate, customer experience, experience management, and customer churn rate.

https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2025.vol10.4.515
PDF

References

Amora, V.C.M. & Juanzon, J.B.P. (2022). A framework of critical success factors and success criteria for structural works of a mixed-use building construction project. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 267-279. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2022.100123.

Asgharpour, M.J. (2009). Multi-criteria decision making. Tehran: University of Tehran Printing and Publishing Institute.

Brockman, J. (ed) (1997). Quality management and benchmarking in the information sector: Results of recent research. London: Bowker Saur.

Bruno, A.V. & Leidecker, J.K. (1984). Identifying and using critical success factors. Long Range Planning, 17, 23-32.

Choi, I. and Jeong, H. (2019). Model selection for factor analysis: Some new criteria and performance comparisons. Econometric Reviews, 38, 577-596.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2017.1382763

Doerr, J. (2018). Measure what matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation rock the world with OKRs. Portfolio/Penguin.

Ereck, R.A., Juanzon, J.B.P. (2020). Identifying risks in implementing sustainable building materials in condominium fit-out projects using analytic hierarchy process. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 8(6), 1266-1276. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2020.080610

Frefer, A., Mahmoud, M., Haleema, H., & Almamlook, R., (2018). Overview success criteria and critical success factors in project management. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(1), 1-6. DOI: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000244.

Habibi Badrabadi, M. and Mohammadi-Moghaddam, Y. (2011). Theoretical model for explaining motivational programs in knowledge-based organizations. Quarterly Journal of Management Development, Human Resources and Support, 6(22), 21-36.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2021). Guidelines for Library Performance Measurement. The Hague: IFLA.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2022). IFLA Library Standards and Guidelines: Monitoring and Evaluation. The Hague: IFLA.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2013). ISO 2789:2013 — Information and documentation — International library statistics. Geneva: ISO.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2014). ISO 11620:2014 — Information and documentation — Library performance indicators. Geneva: ISO.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2014). ISO 16439:2014 — Information and documentation — Methods for assessing the impact of libraries. Geneva: ISO.

Irvani, T. and Atashgar, K. (2015). A review on service quality models and comparing capabilities. Proceedings, Annual Conference on Management and Business Economics.

Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Shendi, M.R., & and Norouzi, Y. (2013). The study of history of researches about LibQual model in Iran. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 47(2), 191-208. doi: 10.22059/jlib.2013.36419

Jari, A., Pankaj, J., & Bhangale, P., (2013). To study critical factors necessary for a successful construction project. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 2(5), 331-335. DOI: 10.1.1.673.8787.

Juanzon, J.B.P.(2019). Expectations and perceptions in engineering consulting project management quality services: A gap analysis using AHP method and SERVQUAL model. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology, 10(1),38-42. DOI:10.18178/ijimt.2019.10.1.833.

Mirzaei Ahranjani, H., Amiri, M. (2002). Presenting a three-dimensional model for analyzing the philosophical foundations and fundamental infrastructures of management theories. Management Science, 15(56), 3-21.

Moghimi, M., Mirzaei Ahranjani, H. (2003). Presenting a desirable organizational model for Iranian non-governmental organizations using an entrepreneurial approach. Management & Knowledge, 16(2), 101-138.

Najafizadeh, M., & Zahedi, S.M. (2016). Pathology of employee performance management system at qazvin university of medical sciences by using three- dimensional. Journal of Development & evolution Management, 25, 59-69.

Niven, P. R., & Lamorte, B. (2016). Objectives and key results: Driving focus, alignment, and engagement with OKRs. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Olazabal et.al (2024). Current indicators and metrics hinder effective urban climate adaptation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3981396/v1

Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Management Review, spring, 39-48.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430.

Rubin, R. E. (2010). Foundations of Library and Information Science, third edition. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.

Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for decision making. Kobe, Japan, 1-69.

Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M., & Coyle, M. (1992). Critical success factors for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118, 94-111.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(94).

Sari, R. P. (2015). Integration of key performance indicator into the corporate strategic planning: Case study at PT. Inti Luhur Fuja Abadi, Pasuruan, East Java, Indonesia. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Sadaghiani, J. S., Dehghan, N., Navabi Zand, K. (2011). Impact of international market entry strategy on export performance. The Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 3(1), 53-70. DOI:10.22436/jmcs.03.01.05

Stray, V., Gundelsby, J. H., Ulfsnes, R., & Moe, N.B. (2022). How agile teams make Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) work. Pittsburgh, PA: USA ACM. DOI:10.1145/3529320.3529332

Tanzil, D. and Beloff, B. R. (2006). Assessing impacts: Overview on sustainability indicators and metrics. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/tqem.20101.

Toor, S.U.R., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005.

Turner, R. J. (1999). Project management: A profession based on knowledge or faith? (editorial). International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 329–330.

Vardeman, K.K. and Wu, J . (2019). LibQUAL Results bring more questions than answers. In Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference, December 4-6, 2018, Houston, Texas, eds. Sue Baughman, Steve Hiller, Katie Monroe, and Angela Pappalardo (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries): 371–382.

Xiang, H. (2023). Research on the construction of informative OKR performance management system for university teachers. C. F. Peng et al. (Eds.): EIMT 2022, AHSSEH 3, pp. 775–783, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-012-1-84.

Xu, Y. (2019). Application and implementation of OKR performance management. Human Resources, 1, 209.

Zis, T.P.V., Psaraftis, H.N., & Reche-Vilanova, M. (2023). Design and application of a key performance indicator (KPI) framework for autonomous shipping in Europe. Maritime Transport Research, 5, Article 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2023.100095

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Librarianship

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.