Is it Necessary: Quality Control in Cataloging?


quality control
technical services
cataloging staff training

How to Cite

Nero, M. D., & He, J. (2018). Is it Necessary: Quality Control in Cataloging?. International Journal of Librarianship, 3(2), 85–95.
Received 2018-12-10
Accepted 2018-12-13
Published 2018-12-21


Catalogers and technical services departments have always struggled with how much is too much when creating and enhancing bibliographic records as well as with what physical processing is needed to make these materials shelf-ready for timely circulation.  Along with these decisions, catalogers also must address what quality control measures, if any, should be in place to guarantee resources are discoverable in the OPAC and discovery service. The authors of this paper describe their process and workflow for the quality control of tangible and electronic resources; they also discuss why quality control is performed. The importance of training cataloging staff on current cataloging rules and practices as a preventive measure to reduce mistakes is an essential part of the process.  The ultimate goal of quality control is to eliminate errors and ensure the library’s resources are accessible.


Bade, D. (2008). The perfect bibliographic record: Platonic ideal, rhetorical strategy or nonsense?. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(1), 109-133.

Chen, S. (2008). Empowering student assistants in the cataloging department through innovative training: The E-Learning Courseware for Basic Cataloging (ECBC) Project. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(2), 221-234.

Graham, P. S. (1990). Quality in cataloging: Making distinctions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16(4), 213-218. Retrieved from Professional Development Collection.

Hanson, H., & Schalow, J. (1999). Two aspects of quality in technical services: Automating for quick availability, and identifying problems, effecting solutions. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 23(4), 433–441.

Harmon, J. C. (1996). The death of quality cataloging: Does it make a difference for library users? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(4), 306-307.

Hider, P., & Tan, K. C. (2008). Constructing record quality measures based on catalog use. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(4), 338-361.

Khurshid, Z. (1997). The application of TQM in cataloguing. Library Management, 18(6), 274-279.

McGurr, M. (2008). Improving the flow of materials in a cataloging department. Library Resources & Technical Services, 52(2), 54-60.

Paiste, M. S. (2003). Defining and achieving quality in cataloging in academic libraries: A literature review. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 27(3), 327-338.

Park, J., Tosaka, Y., Maszaros, S., & Lu, C. (2010). From metadata creation to metadata quality control: Continuing education needs among cataloging and Metadata professionals. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51(3), 158-176. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Petrucciani, A. (2015). Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3-4), 303-313.

Propas, S. W., & Johnson, S. (1998). Outsourcing, quality control, and the acquisitions professional. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 22(3), 279–285.

Schultz-Jones, B., Snow, K., Miksa, S., & Hasenyager Jr, R. L. (2012). Historical and current implications of cataloguing quality for next-generation catalogues. Library Trends, 61(1), 49-82. Retrieved from Project Muse.

Sheeran, R. (1996). Maintaining the cohesive collection: The case for the local cataloger. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(6), 462-465.

Soules, A. (1983). The deterioration of quality cataloging. Library Journal, 108(1), 27-29. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (n.d.). MarcEdit: An introduction to the MARC record editing software MarcEdit. Retrieved from

University of South Alabama (n.d.). University of South Alabama libraries mission statement. Retrieved from

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:         

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and the initial publication in this journal.      

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.      

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to  productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Download data is not yet available.