Abstract
Within the global Library and Information Science profession there is often a disconnect between research and practice. IFLA Journal seeks to help bridge this gap through an editorial process and publishing mandate that encourages mixed methods approaches to research that engages librarians and their communities in the research and information dissemination process in order to translate research in a manner that helps to shape impactful professional practice and share outcomes with the wider profession. This article describes ways in which to engage IFLA Journal and participate in some of its ongoing professional development activities.
References
Bradley, F. (2016). ‘A world with universal literacy.’ IFLA Journal, 42(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216647393
Cooke, L. (2018). Privacy, libraries and the era of big data. IFLA Journal, 44(3), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035218789601
Drijfhout, D., & de Boer, T. (2015). IFLA Journal special issue on Cultural Heritage. IFLA Journal, 41(3), 191–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215604316
Horstmann, W., & Witt, M. (2017). Libraries tackle the challenge of research data management. IFLA Journal, 43(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216688787
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2014). The Lyon Declaration. Retrieved December 7, 2018, from https://www.lyondeclaration.org/
Koltay, T. (2016). Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality. IFLA Journal, 42(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216672238
Mansfield, J. W. (2014). A brief history of the IFLA Journal. IFLA Journal, 40(4), 237–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035214554169
Nakata, M. (2002). Indigenous Knowledge and the Cultural Interface: underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA Journal, 28(5–6), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/034003520202800513