Linked Data Technologies and What Libraries Have Accomplished So Far


Linked Data
Semantic Web
Library of Congress

How to Cite

Wang, Y., & Yang, S. Q. (2018). Linked Data Technologies and What Libraries Have Accomplished So Far. International Journal of Librarianship, 3(1), 3–20.
Received 2018-03-16
Accepted 2018-06-20
Published 2018-07-17
Bookmark and Share


For the past ten years libraries have been working diligently towards Linked Data and the Semantic Web. Due to the complexity and vast scope of Linked Data, many people have a hard time to understand its technical details and its potential for the library community. This paper aims to help librarians better understand some important concepts by explaining the basic Linked Data technologies that consist of Resource Description Framework (RDF), the ontology, and the query language. It also includes an overview of the achievements by libraries around the world in their efforts to turn library data into Linked Data including those by Library of Congress, OCLC, and some other national libraries. Some of the challenges and setbacks that libraries have encountered are analyzed and discussed. In spite of the difficulties, there is no way to turn back. Libraries will have to succeed.


Allemang, D. & Hendler, J. (2012). Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist. 2nd Edition. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.

Berners-Lee, T., & Fischetti, M. (2000). Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. San Francisco: HarperBusiness.

Coyle, K. (2012). Linked Data Tools: Connecting on the Web. Library Technology Reports, 48(4).

Davis Library, University of California. (2016). Survey of Current Library Linked Data Implementation. Retrieved from

Enis, M. (2016). Library.Link Builds Open Web Visibility for Library Catalogs, Events. Library Journal, (June 21). Retrieved from

Heath, T. & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Jin, Q., Hahn, J., & Croll, G. (2016). BibFrame Transformation for Enhanced Discovery. LRTS, 60(4), 223-235

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Library Edition. Austin, Texas:The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from

Library of Congress. (2016, April 21). Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model [White paper]. Retrieved from

McCallum, S. H. (2017). BIBFRAME Development [PDF]. Italian Journal of Library, Archives, and Information Science, 8(3).

Mitchell, E. T. (2013). Library Linked Data: Research and Adoption. Library Technology Reports. 49(5).

Mitchell, E. T. (2016). Library Linked Data: Early Activity and Development. Library Technology Reports. 52(1).

Murphy, B. (2012, June 20). OCLC Adds Linked Data to Retrieved from

OCLC. (2013). Meeting the E-Resources Challenge: An OCLC report on effective management, access and delivery of electronic collections [PDF]. Retrieved from

OCLC. (2017a). OCLC and Linked Data [PDF]. Retrieved from

OCLC. (2017b). WorldCat Work Descriptions [White paper]. Retrieved from

Organizer Group 2018 European BIBFRAME Workshop. (2018, February 8). BIBFRAME Expectations for ILS Vendors. Retrieved from

Papadakis, L., Kyprianos, K., & Stefanidakis, M. (2015). Linked Data URIs and Libraries: The Story So Far. D-Lib Magazine, 21(5/6).

Szeto, K. (2017). The Mystery of the Schubert Song: The Linked Data Promise. Notes. 74(1). 9-23.

Tharani, K. (2015). Linked Data in Libraries: A Case Study of Harvesting and Sharing Bibliographic Metadata with BibFrame. Information and Library Technologies. 34(1).

Wood, D., Zaidman, M., & Ruth, L. (2014). Linked Data: Structured Data on the Web. Shelter Island, NY: Manning Publications Co.

Wordstream. (n.d.). Google Ads: What Are Google Ads & How Do They Work? Retrieved from


Download data is not yet available.