Abstract
In response to the U.S. Department of Justice’s final Title II rule on web accessibility, libraries are increasingly required to remediate complex web ecosystems under constrained timelines and capacity. While much accessibility guidance emphasizes technical compliance, less attention has been paid to the organizational, relational, and pedagogical dimensions of accessibility work in libraries. This practice-based report describes a UX-informed approach to web accessibility remediation in an academic library, grounded in principles of collective care, microlearning, and co-creation.
Positioning library employees as the primary users of accessibility systems, documentation, and workflows, this project applied a user experience (UX) design-inspired process to employee-facing implementation efforts. Interventions included accessibility audits combining automated and manual review, development of a web applications accessibility handbook, governance clarification, microlearning-based remediation strategies, collaborative “web editing parties,” and shared tracking mechanisms. Findings suggest that treating accessibility as a shared practice, rather than an individual compliance task, reduced overwhelm, increased engagement, and supported more sustainable remediation efforts.
Lessons learned highlight the importance of relational UX practices, documentation as infrastructure, and iterative learning. This report offers practical insights for libraries preparing for Title II compliance while seeking to cultivate inclusive and sustainable accessibility practices.
References
Association of Research Libraries. (n.d.). ADA Title II regulations: Implications for libraries. https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ADA-Title-II-regulations_-implications-for-libraries.pdf
Davis, R. C. (2025). Ready for it: Ensuring web content accessibility in libraries. Choice360.
Getz, K., & Shotick, K. (2025). Designing for neurodiversity in web spaces. In A. Boyer & A. El-Chidiac (Eds.), Supporting neurodiverse students in academic libraries (pp. 211–234). Association of College and Research Libraries.
Hunt, R. (2025, March 29). What is the UX design process? 5 steps to success. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/ux-design-process-guide
Liu, Y., Bielefield, A., & Beckwith, J. (2024). ADA digital accessibility on academic library websites. College & Research Libraries, 85(2), 166–186. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.2.166
Pereyaslavska, K. (2020, November 30). Accessibility librarian competencies. ARL Views. https://www.arl.org/blog/accessibility-librarian-competencies
Spina, C., & Albrecht Oling, R. (2025). The digital accessibility handbook for libraries. ALA Editions in collaboration with CORE.
Wentz, B., Gorham, U., & Jaeger, P. T. (2023). Academic libraries and their legal obligation for content accessibility. First Monday, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i1.12892
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. (2025a). [Draft] Accessibility roles and responsibilities mapping (ARRM). World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning/arrm
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. (2025b). [Draft] Content author responsibilities. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning/arrm/content-author
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. (2025c). [Draft] Roles involved in accessibility. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning/arrm/roles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Librarianship
