Bridging the Gap
Integrating Archival Descriptive Best Practices in an Item-Level Dominated Museum Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2024.vol9.2.359Abstract
Libraries, archives, and museum collections are distinct collecting entities that share similarities in their concepts and workflows, yet diverge in their fundamental approaches to descriptive work. While librarians and archivists are frequently associated due to their placement within institutional hierarchies and shared academic backgrounds, librarians and museum registrars are more naturally aligned in the realm of metadata. Both librarians and registrars traditionally emphasize item-level description whereas archivists prioritize a creator and collection-based approach. This article aims to explore the challenges of maintaining archival descriptive best practices within a museum culture that predominantly emphasizes object collections and item-level documentation. By identifying tools, techniques, and strategies archives can implement, museum staff can better understand and appreciate the unique contributions of archival practices. Additionally, advocating for archival standards to senior staff will foster a more comprehensive and holistic approach to cataloging and preserving cultural heritage. By recognizing the value of both item-level and collection-based approaches, the museum can create a more robust and interconnected system of documentation, enhancing the overall quality and accessibility of their collections and archives.
Downloads
References
Allen, S. M. (2002). Nobody Knows You’re a Dog (or Library, or Museum, or Archive) on the
Internet: The Convergence of Three Cultures. 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 18-24, 2002.
Blewer, Ashley (2017). The Collection Management System Collection: Crowd-sourcing a list of
digital repository options. Retrieved January 05, 2024, from https://bits.ashleyblewer.com/blog/2017/08/09/collection-management-system-collection/
Gabriel, J. R. (2017). Metadata Standards Across Libraries, Archives, and Museums.
https://www.academia.edu/4044460/Metadata_Standards_Across_Libraries_Archives_and_Museums
Getty Research Institute. (n.d.). Art & Architecture Thesaurus. Retrieved November 02, 2023,
from https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/aat/
Greene, M., & Meissner, D. (2005). More Product, Less Process: Revamping Traditional
Archival Processing. The American Archivist, 68(2), 208–263.
Hintz, C. (2015, November 10). Tag Archives: archival description. Chaos ---> Order.
https://icantiemyownshoes.wordpress.com/tag/archival-description/.
Jones, M. (2015). Artefacts and Archives: Considering Cross-Collection Knowledge Networks in
Museums. MWA2015: Museums and the Web Asia.
The Library of Congress. (2023). Library of Congress Classification. Retrieved November 02,
, from https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcc.html
Purcell, A. (2015). Donors and Archives: A Guidebook for Successful Programs. Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers.
Santamaria, D. (2014). Extensible Processing for Archives and Special Collections: Reducing
Processing Backlogs. American Library Association.
Colby Sawyer College. (n.d.). textilesCollection_children_ _003d. Colby-Sawyer College
Archives. Retrieved October 29, 2023, from
https://archives.colby-sawyer.edu/uncategorized/IO_184a880d-a3f2-4a3b-9d52-1513c810be74/
Colby Sawyer College. (n.d.). textilesCollection_children_ _003. Colby-Sawyer College
Archives. Retrieved October 29, 2023, from https://archives.colby- sawyer.edu/uncategorized/SO_7d5f0922-24ac-445e-8a8f-a745f9a358d7/
TS-DACS (Society of American Archivists’ Technical Subcommittee on Describing Archives: A
Content Standard). (n.d.). Describing Archives: A Content Standard. Retrieved November 02, 2023, from https://saa-ts-dacs.github.io/dacs/06_part_I/02_chapter_01.html
Wan, J., Yubin Z., Gang C., & Junkai, Y. (2014). Designing a Multi-Level Metadata Standard
Based on Dublin Core for Museum Data. Semantic Scholar.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Librarianship

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

