Making Open Resources Discoverable: Collaborative Approaches for Enhanced Access

How to Cite

Mi, J. (2024). Making Open Resources Discoverable: Collaborative Approaches for Enhanced Access . International Journal of Librarianship, 8(4), 17–29.
Received 2023-09-14
Accepted 2024-01-17
Published 2024-01-31


This article explores collaborative efforts to enhance the discoverability of open access resources. It highlights the pivotal role of librarians, educators, library system platform vendors, and publishers in improving access to these valuable resources. Through collective expertise and cooperation, these collaborative approaches aim to unlock the potential of open resources, benefiting researchers, students, and the broader academic community. By working together and leveraging their collective knowledge, these collaborative efforts promise to tap into the wealth of open resources, making them more accessible for professors, students, and the broader academic community.


Curcic, D. (2023, June 2). Open access publishing statistics. WordsRated. access-publishing-statistics/

Brainard, J., and Kaiser, J. (2023). U.S. to require free access to papers on all research it funds. Science, 377(6610), 1026-1027.

Furlough, M. (2010). Open access, education research, and discovery. Teachers College Record, 112(10), 2623–2648.

Renaville, F. (2016). Open access and discovery tools: how do primo libraries manage green open access collections? In K. J. Varnum (Ed.) Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to Your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content, ALA Editions, (pp.233-256, 2016). ALA.

Bulock, C., Hosburgh, N., and Mann, S. (2015). OA in the library collection: the challenges of identifying and maintaining open access resources. The Serials Librarian, 68(1–4),79–86.

Dove, J.G. (2017). Full discovery: What is the publisher's role? Learned Publishing, 30: 81-86.

Edmunds, J., & Enriquez, A. (2020). Increasing Visibility of Open Access Materials in a Library Catalog: Case Study at a Large Academic Research Library. Journal of Library Metadata, 20(2-3), 127-154, DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2020.1821946

Quarati, A. (2023). Open Government Data: Usage trends and metadata quality. Journal of Information Science, 49(4), 887-910.

Zhu, J. (2023). Unlocking potential: Harnessing the power of metadata for discoverability and accessibility. Information Services & Use, (Preprint), 1-8.

Bascones, M., & Staniforth, A. (2018). What is all this fuss about? Is wrong metadata really bad for libraries and their end-users? Insights: The UKSG Journal, 31(0), 41.DOI:

Pennington, B. (2016). Where is that? The challenges of including hybrid journal articles in the library research process, Serials Review, 42(4), 306-310. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2016.1243035

Bulock, C. (2021). Finding open content in the library is surprisingly hard. Serials Review, 47(2), 68-70. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2021.1936416

Ex Libris Knowledge Center. (2023, November 8). CDI Collection Lists for Alma Customers.

Open Access Indication in Primo VE (n.d.). Ex Libris Knowledge Center. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from

Gordon, G. (2021, September). The rise of preprints. Elsevier Connect.

Clarivate (2023, February 9). Clarivate Adds Preprint Citation Index to the Web of Science

CDI Document Attributes (n.d.). Ex Libris Knowledge Center. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from

Configuring CDI Document Attributes in Primo VE (n.d.). Ex Libris Knowledge Center. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Librarianship


Download data is not yet available.