Finding the Right Platform
A Report on Building a Publishing Platform Crosswalk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2024.vol8.4.342Abstract
This Report from the Field introduces a collaboratively authored set of documentation that compares digital publishing platforms that are typically used by library publishers. This report discusses how we created this set of crosswalks that compare 10 publishing platforms, most of which are academy-owned and open-source. These platforms are used to create eBooks, digital humanities projects, journals, collections, and community projects, and the crosswalks compare a set of common features each has, including hosting options and cost, ingestion options, interactivity, archive and preservation features, export options, accessibility, and other features. We walk readers through how to use this Creative-Commons-licensed tool to compare platforms, features, and project types, with the hopes that users (be they librarians or authors) can easily compare and make decisions about which platform might best suit their publishing needs.
Downloads
References
Brown Library receives second NEH grant for digital publishing institute. (2023, Aug. 15). Brown University library news. https://blogs.brown.edu/libnews/second-neh-grant-for-digital-publishing-institute/
COPE. (2023). Flowcharts. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Flowcharts
DiRT [Digital Research Tools]. (2018, June 15). https://web.archive.org/web/20180615212954/http://dirtdirectory.org/tadirah/organizing
Guimont, Corinne; Vaughn, Matthew & Ball, Cheryl E. (2023, May 9). Building a publishing platform crosswalk: A documentation month case study [Virtual presentation]. Library Publishing Forum.
Hansen, D., Milewicz, L., Mangiafico, P., Shaw, W., Begali, M., McGurrin, V., Hansen, D., Milewicz, L., & Mangiafico, P. (2019). A framework for library support of expansive digital publishing. PubPub. https://doi.org/10.21428/680f3353
Library Publishing Coalition. (2023, May 31). LPForum23: Model for diversifying & expanding digital publishing: Brown Univ library’s NEH institute. YouTube. https://youtu.be/hfF3M1a-6sU
Maxwell, John W., Bordini, Alessandra, & Shamash, Katie. (2016). Reassembling scholarly communications: An evaluation of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation’s monograph initiative. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0020.101
Maxwell, J. W., Hanson, E., Desai, L., Tiampo, C., O’Donnell, K., Ketheeswaran, A., … Michelle, E. (2019). Mind the Gap: A Landscape Analysis of Open Source Publishing Tools and Platforms (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.21428/6bc8b38c.2e2f6c3f
Mellon Foundation awards new digital publishing grants. (2015, March 26). Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2015/03/27/mellon-foundation-awards-new-digital-publishing-grants
Pathfinder—OPERAS. (n.d.). https://operas-eu.org/services/publishing-service-portal-psp/
Straumsheim, Carl. (2015, Feb. 24). Piecing together publishing. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/02/25/researchers-university-press-directors-emboldened-mellon-foundation-interest
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Librarianship

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

