A Bibliometric Study of Family Studies Journals Using Journal Impact Factors, CiteScore and H-index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2021.vol6.1.174Abstract
Although there are bibliometric studies of journals in various fields, the field of family studies remains unexplored. Using the bibliometric metrics of the two-year and five-year Journal Impact Factors, the H-index, and the newly revised CiteScore, this paper examines the relationships among these metrics in a bibliometric study of forty-four representative family studies journals. The citation data were drawn from Journal Citation Reports, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The correlation analysis found strong positive relationships on the metrics. Despite the strong correlations, discrepancies in rank orders of the journals were found. A possible explanation of noticeable discrepancy in rankings was provided, and the implications of the study for stakeholders were discussed.
Downloads
References
Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2011). Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an environmental sciences perspective. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 77(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.7553/77-2-58
Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2013). Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 727-744. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2011-0174
Ahmad, S., Abdel-Magid, H. I. M., Abdel-Magid, I. M., Bano, E., & Waris, A. (2019). An analogy in scientometric journal factors of importance of remote sensing journals. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(2), 79-85. DOI:10.5530/jscires.8.2.13
Bayer, A. E. (1982). A bibliometric analysis of marriage and family literature. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44(3), 527-538. DOI: 10.2307/351577
Braun, T., Glӓnzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4
Brown, T., & Gutman, S. A. (2019). A comparison of bibliometric indicators in occupational therapy journals published in English. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(2), 125-135. DOI: 10.1177/0008417419831453
Chapman, K., & Ellinger, A. E. (2019). An evaluation of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar citations in operations management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(4), 1039–1053. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2019-0110
Chen, W., Geng, Y., Zhong, S., Zhuang, M, & Pan, H. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 23503–23513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08760-x
Clarivate Analytics. (2020a). Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/journal-citation-reports/
Clarivate Analytics. (2020b). Web of Science Core Collection. Web of Science. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science-core-collection/
Clarivate Analytics. (2020c). Web of Science Core Collection Help. Web of Science. Retrieved from http://images.webofknowledge.com.srv-proxy1.library.tamu.edu//WOKRS535R111 /help/WOS/hs_language.html
Delgado, E., & Repiso, R. (2013). The impact of communication journals: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus. Comunicar, 21(41), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-04
Dew, J. (2008). Themes and trends of Journal of Family and Economic Issues: A review of twenty years (1988–2007). Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 29, 496-540. DOI 10.1007/s10834-008-9118-7
Elsevier. (n.d.). Sources. Scopus Preview. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/sources
Elsevier. (2020). Scopus Content Coverage Guide. Scopus Preview. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/?a=69451
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.
Google Scholar. (n.d.). Inclusion. Google Scholar. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html#content
Harzing, A. W. (2020). Publish or Perish. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm
Harzing, A.W., & van der Wal, R. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20953
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hirschberg, J. G., & Lye, J. N. (2020). Grading journals in economics: The ABCS of the ABDC. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(4), 876-921. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12369
Hodge, D. R., & Lacasse, J. R. (2011). Ranking disciplinary journals with the Google Scholar h-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 579-596. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024
James, C., Colledge, L., Meester, W., Azoulay, N., & Plume, A. (2019). CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index. Learned Publishing, 32, 367-374. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1246
Jensen, T. M., & Howard, M. O. (2015). Perceived stepparent-child relationship quality: A systematic review of stepchildren’s perspectives. Marriage & Family Review, 51(2), 99-153. DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2015.1006717
Jones, A. C., Johnson, N. C., Wenglein, S., & Elshershaby, S. T. (2019). The state of sex research in MFT and family studies literature: A seventeen‐year content analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45(2), 275-295. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12344
Lou, Y. C., & Lin, H. F. (2012). Estimate of global research trends and performance
in family therapy in Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 90, 807-823. DOI 10.1007/s11192-011-0549-9
Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E. (2019, December 3). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: Which is best for me? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/103443/
Minasny, B., Hartemink, A. E., McBratney, A., & Jang, H. J. (2013). Citations and h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. PEERJ, 1, e183. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.183
Mingers, J., Macri, F., & Petrovici, D. (2012). Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management, Information Processing and Management, 48(2), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.009
Moed, H. F., Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2016). A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 533-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.017
Okagbue, H. I., Adamu, P. I., & Bishop, S. A. (2019). Curve estimation models for estimation and prediction of Impact Factor and CiteScore using the journal percentiles: A case study of telecommunication journals. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 15(14), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11373
Okagbue, H. I., Bishop, S. A. Adamu, P. I., Opanuga, A. A., & Obasi, E. C. M. (2020). Analysis of percentiles of computer science, theory and methods journals: CiteScore versus Impact Factor. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 40(1), 11-17. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.40.1.14866
Okagbue, H. I., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2020). Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top‑ranked library and information science journals. Scientometrics, 124, 797-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03457-x
Perry-Jenkins, M., & Gerstel, N. (2020). Work and family in the second decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 420-453. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12636
Scopus, (2020, June 9). CiteScore 2019 now LIVE! [Blog post]. Retrieved from: https://blog.scopus.com/posts/citescore-2019-now-live
Tran, B. X., Pham, T. V, Ha, G. H., Ngo, A. T., Nguyen, L. H., Vu, T. T. M., Do, H. N., … Ho, R. C. M. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the global research trend in child maltreatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1456. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15071456
Vanclay, J. K. (2008). Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.002
Villaseñor‑Almaraz, M., Islas‑Serrano, J., Murata, C., & Roldan‑Valadez, E. (2019). Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging journals. La Radiologia Medica, 124, 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-00996-z
Yuen, J. (2018). Comparison of Impact Factor, Eigenfactor metrics, and SCImago Journal Rank
indicator, and H-index for neurosurgical and spinal surgical journals. World Neurosurgery, 119, e328-e337.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Librarianship
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
