In recent years, service learning – a pedagogical approach that integrates learning through service in the community – has gained increasing popularity in higher education as a means to enhance student learning and civic engagement. Service learning is relevant to social work education because of its emphasis on social justice and the amelioration of social problems and field education through practicum sites. The benefits of service learning, however, are dependent on successful integration of this pedagogical approach into the classroom. By developing a web-based learning module, this project aims to explore the possibility of using community asset mapping and geographic information systems (GIS) as an integrated technology tool to promote service learning in social work education. An assessment of this module was conducted by a student survey. The overall positive feedback on the module indicates its contribution to social work study as well as its potential applicability to larger contexts. The project can serve as a starting point for developing best practices for the training of students in mapping and spatial thinking in their community practices that would benefit other disciplines as well. The project supports the university’s mission to improve student-centred, interdisciplinary, and innovative teaching and learning, and its commitment to enhance the economic and social well-being of the local communities.
Bauer, T., Kniffin, L. E., & Priest, K. L. (2015). The future of service-learning and community engagement: asset-based approaches and student learning in first-year courses. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 22(1), 89-93.
Centre for Community Health and Development. (2020). Identifying Community Assets and Resources. Community Tool Box, Center for Community Health and Development, the University of Kansas. Retrieved from https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/identify-community-assets/main
Donaldson, L. P., & Daughtery, L. (2011). Introducing asset-based models of social justice into service learning: A social work approach. Journal of Community Practice, 19(1), 80-99.
Felke, Thomas, P. (2019). The use of Geographic Information Systems for social work education, research, and practice. In L. Goldkind, L. Wolf, P.P. Freddolino (Eds.), Digital social work: Tools for practice with individuals, organizations, and communities. (pp. 145-167). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Felke, Thomas, P. (2014). Building capacity for the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in social work planning, practice, and research. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(1-2), 81-92.
Garoutte, L. & McCarthy-Gilmore, K. (2014) Preparing students for community-based learning using an asset-based approach. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 48-61.
Gerstenblatt, P. & Gilbert, D.J. (2014) Framing service learning in social work: an interdisciplinary elective course embedded within a university-community partnership. Social Work Education, 33, 1037-1053.
Graham, S. R., Carlton, C., Gaede, D., & Jamison, B. (2011). The benefits of using geographic information systems as a community assessment tool. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 126(2), 298–303.
Harkavy, I. (2004) Service-learning and the development of democratic universities, democratic schools, and democratic good societies in the 21st century. In M. Welch & S. H. Billig (Eds.), New perspectives in service-learning: Research to advance the field (pp. 3–22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Hillier, A. E. (2007). Why social work needs mapping. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/spp_papers/86
Jacoby, B. A. (Ed.). (2009). Civic engagement in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kretzmann, John P. & John L. McKnight. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path towards finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. ACTA Publications, Chicago, IL.
Lemieux, C. M., & Allen, P. D. (2007). Service learning in social work education: The state of knowledge, pedagogical practicalities, and practice conundrums. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(2), 309-326.
Maclachlan, J., Brodeur, J. J., Bagg, J. L., Chiappetta-Swanson, C., Vine, M. M., & Vajoczki, S. (2014). An assessment of a blended learning model for information and geospatial literacy. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
McGuire, L. E., & Majewski, V. (2011). Editorial: Social work and service learning in the age of competency-based education. Advances in Social Work, 12(1), 1–vii.
Mui, A. B., Nelson, S., Huang, B., He, Y., & Wilson, K. (2015). Development of a web-enabled learning platform for geospatial laboratories: Improving the undergraduate learning experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 356-368.
Phillips, A. (2011). Service-learning and social work competency-based education:
A ‘goodness of fit’? Advances in Social Work, 12(1), 1-20.
Sharpe, P.A., Greaney, M. L., Lee, P., & Royce, S.W. (2000). Assets-oriented community assessment. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 115(2/3), 205-211.
Taylor, A., Butterwick, S., Raykov, M., Glick, S., Peikazadki, N. & Mehrabi, S. (2015). Community service learning in Canadian higher education. Knowledge Synthesis Report for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
Lamb, Theodore. (2005). The retrospective pretest: an imperfect but useful tool. Harvard Family Research Project: The Evaluation Exchange, XI(2). Retrieved from https://archive.globalfrp.org/evaluation/the-evaluation-exchange/issue-archive/evaluation-methodology/the-retrospective-pretest-an-imperfect-but-useful-tool
University of Windsor. (2010). The Strategic Plan for the University of Windsor. Retrieved from http://www1.uwindsor.ca/hr/strategic-plan
Wier, K. R., & Robertson, J. G. (1998). Teaching geographic information systems for social work applications. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 81-96.
Wilson, K.O. (2016). Beyond the ecomap: GIS as a promising yet chronically underutilized method in social work. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 18(2), 58-66.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.