ICCPR Article 27 as a Basis for Multilingual Library Services: Implications of Treaty Implementation in the US Context

Abstract

In response to a rapidly diversifying population, American libraries have invested considerable effort in improving collections and services in non-English languages. For the past decade, the American Library Association’s Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Multilingual Collections and Services and its Guidelines for Library Services to Spanish-Speaking Library Users have represented the aspirations of the professional community to achieve best practices in this area. At the same time, a growing interest in critically aligning librarianship with human rights work has generated rich reflection on the application of the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Largely overlooked in this process, however, has been the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which, in contrast to the UDHR, is legally binding on states parties and has been ratified by the United States. This article examines the implications of ICCPR Article 27’s guarantees of cultural and language rights for minorities on the provision of non-English library collections and services, arguing that the treaty provides a legal foundation for library advocacy to support the work envisioned in the ALA’s guideline documents.

https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2020.vol5.1.141
PDF

References

Albarillo, F. (2010). Cultural rights and language rights in libraries. In Edwards, J. B. & Edwards, S. P. (Eds.), Beyond Article 19: libraries and social and cultural rights (pp. 85–112). Duluth: Library Juice Press.

American Library Association. (2007). Guidelines for the development and promotion of multilingual library collections and services. http://www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/guidemultilingual

Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona. (1996). 520 U.S. 43.

Asian American Business Group v. City of Pomona. (1989). 716 F. Supp. 1328.

Betancourt, I. (1992). “The Babel myth”: The English-only movement and its implications for libraries. Wilson Library Bulletin 66(6), 38–41.

Birdsall, W. F. (2005). Libraries and the communicative citizen in the twenty-first century. Libri, 55(2–3), 75–83.

Board of Trustees of the Cincinnati Public Library. (1918, May 9). ‘Kultur’ of the Kaiser’s Kind. Cincinnati Enquirer.

Burchill, R. (2004). Minority Rights. In Conte, A., Davidson, S. & Burchill, R. Defining Civil and Political Rights: The Jurisprudence of the United Nations Human Rights Committee (Aldershot: Ashgate) p. 189).

Byrne, A. (2004). Libraries and democracy – management implications. Library Management 25(1/2), 11‐16.

Castan, M. & Debeljak, J. (2012). Indigenous peoples’ human rights and the Victorian Charter: a framework for reorienting recordkeeping and archival practice. Archival Science 12, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9164-z

Cholewinski, R. (2005). Migrants as minorities: integration and inclusion in the enlarged European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 695–716.

Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute. (2012, December 8). U.S. compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: suggested list of issues to country report task force on the United States. https://www.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/Combined%20ICCPR%20submisstions.pdf

Combs, M. C., Evans, C., Fletcher, T., Parra, E., & Jiménez, A. (2005). Bilingualism for the children: Implementing a dual-language program in an English-only state. Educational Policy, 19(5), 701–728.

Del Valle, S. (2003). Language rights and the law in the United States: Finding our voices (Vol. 40). Multilingual Matters.

Donders, Y. (2010). Do cultural diversity and human rights make a good match?. International social science journal, 61(199), 15–35.

Edwards, J. B. (2010). Symbolic possibilities. In Edwards, J. B. & Edwards, S. P. (Eds.), Beyond Article 19: libraries and social and cultural rights (pp. 7–40). Duluth: Library Juice Press.

Firestone, J. & Lilley, J. (2005). Aboriginal subsistence whaling and the right to practice and revitalize cultural traditions and customs. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 8, pp. 216–217.

Griffin, J. (2008). On human rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

Henkin, L. (1995). “U.S. ratification of human rights conventions: the ghost of Senator Bricker”. American Journal of International Law 89(2), 341–50.

Hinton, K. A. (2015). “We Only Teach in English”: An Examination of Bilingual-In-Name-Only Classrooms. In Freeman, Y. S. & Freeman, D. E. (Eds.). Research on preparing inservice teachers to work effectively with emergent bilinguals (pp. 265-289). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Holder, C. (2008). Culture as an activity and human right: an important advance for indigenous peoples and international law. Alternatives, 33(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540803300102

Iacovino, L. (2010). Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science 10, 353–372.

Mathiesen, K. (2012, June 10). The human right to a public library. Journal of Information Ethics. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2081178

Morsink, J. (2000). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: origins, drafting, and intent. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Packer. (1999). Problems in defining minorities. In Fottrell, D. & Bowring, B. (Eds.), Minority and group rights in the new millennium. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Paust, J. (2003). International law as law of the United States. Carolina Academic Press.

Sinn, D. (2012). Impact of digital archival collections on historical research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(8), 1521–37.

Skutnabb‐Kangas, T. (1999). Linguistic human rights—are you naïve, or what? TESOL Journal, 8(3), 6–12.

Stamatopoulou-Robbins, E. (2007). Cultural rights in international law: Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and beyond. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004157521.i-336

Sturges, P. & Gastinger, A. (2010). Information literacy as a human right. Libri 60(3), 195–202.

UN Human Rights Committee. (2009, March 27). Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru. Comm. 1457/2006, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006. http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/2009.03.27_Poma_Poma_v_Peru.htm

UN Human Rights Committee. (2009, March 19). Rakhim Mavlonov and Shansiy Sa’di v. Uzbekistan. Comm. 1334/2004, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/95/D/1334/2004.

UN Human Rights Committee. (2006). Concluding Observations of the HRC: United States of America. U.N. Doc. No. CCPR/C/USA/CO/3/Rev.1.

UN Human Rights Committee. (2000). J.G.A. Diergaardt (late Captain of the Rehoboth Baster Community) et al. v. Namibia. Comm. 760/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/69/D/760/1997. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session69/view760.htm

UN Human Rights Committee. (1995). Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand. Comm. 547/1993, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/55/D/547/1993. http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/1995.10.13_Mahuika_v_New_Zealand.htm

UN Human Rights Committee. (1994, November 8). Länsman et al. v. Finland. Communication 511/1992, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/52/D/511/1992. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/vws511.htm

UN Human Rights Committee. (1994, April 8). CCPR general comment no. 23: Article 27 (rights of minorities). CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5. https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fc0.html

UN Human Rights Committee. (1994). General Comment No. 24 (52). U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev. 1/Add. 6.

Vázquez, Carlos Manuel (1992). Treaty-based rights and remedies of individuals. Columbia Law Review 92, 1082–1163.

Ward, M. (1988, January 14). In Monterey Park: council sued in takeover of library. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-01-14-ga-36045-story.html

Wiley, T. G. (1998). The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In Ricento, T. & Burnaby, B. (Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada (pp. 211–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Yniguez v. Mofford. (1990). 730 F. Supp. 309.

Yoo, J. C. (1999). Globalism and the Constitution: treaties, non-self-execution, and the original understanding. Columbia Law Review 99(8), 1955–2094.

Yupsanis, A. (2013). Article 27 of the ICCPR revisited - the right to culture as a normative source for minority / indigenous participatory claims in the case law of the Human Rights Committee. Hague Yearbook of International Law 26, 345–383.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.